|
Now that all three books in the Unlived Lives trilogy are published in all three formats (well, not exactly. Still waiting for Reckoning in audiobook format to clear the ACX review process. Should be any day now), I thought I would check in on the Many Worlds Interpretation debate/argument.
Emphasis on "argument." Generally, two science nerds, one who believes there are an infinite number of universes parallel to the one we inhabit, the other certain there are not, arguing about something that cannot be proved or disproved. Personally, I don't concern myself with any of that. I chose to write the trilogy as though they did exist simply because it seemed like it could make good fiction. Back to my update, I searched for "Many Worlds theory argument," and the first result was Joe Scott and his video, The Most Convincing Parallel Universe Story. Joe's presentation style eases the viewer into a subject that is challenging for solid C science students like me. But I grasped enough to keep watching to the end. If you've read or listened to one, two, or all three of the Unlived Lives trilogy and have 18 minutes of free time, watch Joe straddle both sides of the Many Worlds theory debate (argument). Doing so won't help you understand what you didn't in my books, but you should enjoy it nevertheless.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Archives
July 2026
|
RSS Feed